canarypapers

Posts Tagged ‘double standard

A REVIEW OF THE BIG SPEECH: When is a little knowledge dangerous? When it’s Sarah Palin.

leave a comment »

The talking heads are unanimous: Sarah Palin gave a command performance last night. Truly, she did — if you’re the sort who likes your scripts well-delivered, on-cue, by a skilled actress. Our local theatre group has many such talents.

Sarah is to be commended for her seamless delivery of this one-man act, peopled as it was with such a diversity of characters: plucky, all-American hockey-mom of five (being unfairly persecuted by the elite liberal media) who rose to be mayor of Wasilla (a small town, whose size is being disrespected by the elite, liberal media), and who then rose to become governor of Alaska (a state which, if you elect Sarah Palin,  promises to give us cheap gas and oil, reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and staunch terrorism everywhere), whereby she proved her skills as a maverick politician, bucking a corrupt, good-old-boy system to restore truth and transparency to Alaskan politics (pay no mind to the man behind the curtain) and will do the same for the corrupt, good-old-boy system in Washington (which is run by politicians whose job skills pale in comparison to hers) because, for one thing, she represents ‘real’ Americans, (not those bitter, unpatriotic ones who aren’t proud of their country in both good and bad times, such as when that country lets its citizens fall, en masse, through the cracks into joblessness and financial despair, while paying $16 billion per month for two wars, while its leadership has become the scorn and ridicule of the world, for its lawlessness and bullying) not those liberal, elist democrats, who know nothing about fiscal responsibility, and just want to spend, spend, spend and run our lives through big government (that’s $140 per bitter household, per month, to fund the two wars) and, for another thing, she is better qualified to be vice-president than Barack Obama and Joe Biden rolled together (her qualifications, by now, should be self-evident to all, unless you’re with the liberal, elitist media) and, plus, she can ‘hold her own’ against the big boys (careful on your attacks, angry elitist liberals, or they’ll pull the sexism-card) as we saw in the sarcastic, condescending, disrespectful attacks she so skillfully waged, and with such relish, on Obama and Biden (as their class act — evidenced in the constant, outward respect they’ve shown for Sarah and her family this week — was lost on her, which I guess makes Obama and Biden weak on terror), proving that Sarah Palin is therefore tough enough to stand up to the terrorists and terrorist nations in the world (how, exactly, do you pronounce all these crazy Islamic terrorist words?)  and ready to carry the maverick mantle with her running-mate, John McCain (did I mention he’s a POW?) all the way to the White House, where she is prepared, on day one, to be vice-president, a mere heartbeat from the presidency (“What is it, exactly, that the VP does every day?”)

The problem is — the same as it was before she delivered her speech celebre — Sarah Palin can only aspire to *act* as if she had command of the facts, can only aspire to *act* as if has the depth of experience to qualify her to competently hold high office, can only aspire to *act* presidential. And she can only aspire to maintain this act, so long as there is a crew of players behind the scenes to arrange the sets and feed her the lines. 

This was the very problem from which George Bush (and, by extension, all of us) suffered for the past 8 years. He brought to the White House a college degree in business, a term as governor, and a set of ideals borrowed from his father. He brought little else in the way of credentials, unless you count his bull-headed insistence that he knew what he was doing, despite his profound ignorance of constitutional law and political science, and a perplexing lack of curiosity over the goings-on in his administration. Here, he was ready-made to be the very leader he became: a hapless, button-eyed puppet to a man named Dick Cheney who did, indeed, own an impressive command of the facts — not to mention a shrewd eye for business, as CEO of a corporation whose life blood is war and oil, and a shrewd team of lawyers, such as David Addington, who exploited and tinkered with the the Constitution to give Dick Cheney unprecedented power.

The State of the Union

In the wake of this malignant tinkering, our government body, our Constitution and our Bill of Rights have undergone radical changes over the past 8 years, the likes of which most Americans are unaware and would be incredulous to believe. In the course of this change, the checks and balances in our Constitution — designed to protect us from such an invasion from within — were exploited by Cheney and Addington to render powerless any attempt to cut such a malignancy from the government body. When people say that Dick Cheney is the most powerful man in the world, it is no hyperbole. And when people say that Dick Addington is the most powerful man you’ve never known, they are not kidding. For evidence, one need look no further than the powerlessness of our lawmakers on Capitol Hill, despite that some have fought tooth and nail to stop this seemingly unstoppable force that has undermined our Constitution and our democracy.

The video, below, gives about as succinct an example as you could find. Here, in the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee hearing this past June, committee members sought answers to a simple question: “Could our president order the torturing of the children of terrorist suspects, or the live burial of terrorist suspects, to extract information?” In the skilled hands of Cheney attorneys, Addington and Yoo, it is possible to dodge answers and stonewall the hearings, through clever semantics, legal “sleights of hand,” and stalling to run-out the clock on the 5-minute time limit on testimony. Most Americans are oblivious to the existence of such hearings, which makes all the more concerning the blind acceptance many Americans have extended to Sarah Palin’s thin credentials. This shows a lack of understanding, an ignorance of the real-time issues a president confronts in the course of his or her job — issues that are layered in myriad nuances, that require specific skills and depths of experience. These credentials are sorely lacking in Sarah Palin. Her ridicule of Barack Obama during her speech, when she jeered that he is the sort who would stand up for the rights of terrorist suspects, demanding they be read their rights, reveals a proufoundly dangerous way of thinking for a leader of a democratic society. Granted, there are many, many Americans who would advocate and cheer-on the hanging death of terrorist suspects, without due process or a trial to prove or disprove their innocence. Those who believe it is fair for an innocent human being to be punished for the actions of others, are no different from those very terrorists we claim to abhor.

Americans wave the flag as vigorously today as they did 8 years ago, even as the democracy over which that flag unfurls has become a shadow of its former self. Constitutional law may not be as sexy as mooseburgers, assault rifles and hockey moms but, when it comes to maintaining a democracy, the Constitution has proven itself to be indispensible for over 200 years. What this country needs, first and foremost, is a strong leader with an eye toward restoring our moral compass, and with the knowledge, experience and ability to work with our other lawmakers to restore our Constitution. Without this, the flag we honor represents a democracy that no longer quite exists, except in myth. 

Substance vs. Subtext

There are many in this country who felt a certain gratitude this past May, when Sen. Obama announced one of the goals he intends to accomplish during his first 100 days in office: “I would call my attorney general in and review every single executive order issued by George Bush and overturn those laws or executive decisions that I feel violate the constitution.” Being a Harvard law school graduate, and serving as the president of the Harvard Law Review, and teaching constitutional law for 12 years affords him the credentials to not only aspire to such a task, but to undertake it with some competency. Indeed, some would rightfully claim that the six years Obama served in the Illinois State Senate, followed by nearly 4 years in the U.S. Senate, only add these credentials. There is little doubt that he would receive a wide round of applause from his fellow lawmakers in Congress for undertaking this necessary and most patriotic task to restore our Constitution to its pre-Cheney integrity. This is but one step, and a tiny one at that, given the enormity of change our country has seen over the past 8 years — change that could never have taken place in the open, but which thrived in dark secrecy, which is why so few Americans appreciate the urgency of what lies before us.   

Sarah Palin said it best near the end of her speech: “For a season, a gifted speaker can inspire with his words.”

Sarah Palin may very well be a woman deserving of a mother-of-the-year award and an award for the most popular governor in the country. She would make an inspiring spokesperson for pro-lifers, and a powerful role model for business women everywhere. She needn’t be vice-president to deliver Alaskan oil to the American people. She needn’t be vice-president to address the ongoing need to erase sexism in this country. She can develop this role in her current position as governor of Alaska. 

But Sarah Palin is not ready to be leader of this country, particularly as we emerge from such a dark chapter in the history of our democracy. She gives a great speech, but owns such a shallow command of the facts, as to be dangerous. Here, Sarah Palin is ready-made to be just the leader she’s being groomed to be: a walking, talking PR campaign, whose job is to deliver scripted pep talks, to inspire the uninspired into believing there’s nothing wrong with this country that can’t be fixed with some good old-fashioned, Sarah Palin-style Alaska politics because, godknows, there surely couldn’t be millions of others out here who, given license, could parade out onto a stage and speak with such authority over events of which they know next-to-nothing, thereby insulting an entire country of thinking, intelligent people — men and women alike, but especially women, and most especially those women truly qualified to the vice-presidency. I’d like to think, anyway, that few would embarrass us, as she did, by the cheap relish she enjoyed while hurling the sarcastic, condescending insults she was scripted to wage at her opponents. 

I Feel a Gag Order Coming On

In this vein, we are going to see, in the coming days, the media coerced into silencing the voices of dissent against Sarah Palin. Or, at the very least, softening the criticism. After all, she’s a woman. The media will comply, of course. After all, they’re a business. They’ll bend over backward to avoid getting stuck again with that damned sexist label and being shut-out by the McCain campaign. Maybe 10, 20 years down the road, women will rise again, demanding not only the same rights as men, but the same treatment and the same expectations. For now, chin up, America. Sarah’s got your back. The show must, the show will go on. And, with your help, Sarah Palin is ready to step into George Bush’s shoes and reprise the role of hapless, albeit more glamorous, button-eyed puppet to the Cheney agenda for war and oil, rot and ruin. The American public believes otherwise at their own peril.

______________________________________

by Mantis Katz, for the canarypapers

_____________________________________

Advertisements

A VIDEO COMPENDIUM: Sarah Palin — Maverick executive or just another cowboy?

leave a comment »

McCain and the rest of the Republican Party have been talking feverishly — in tongues, at times — to convince America and the rest of the free world that Sarah Palin was the best possible choice for the McCain ticket. “Her record as a maverick executive speaks for itself!” they say. And we couldn’t agree more. Honestly.

ABOVE: (audio) Sarah Palin giggles as shock jock, Bob Lester, insults Alaska State Senate President, Lydia Green, calling her a “jealous woman,” a “bitch” and “a cancer” (even as it was well-known that Sen. Green is a cancer survivor). Then Lester ridicules the Senator’s weight, in a reference to the size of her chair. Ms. Palin’s only response during this clip (besides the giggles) was to tell Lester, “We’d be honored to have you guys,” when he asked about coming to visit Palin. An Anchorage Daily News op-ed called Palin’s behavior, “plain and simple one of the most unprofessional, childish and inexcusable performances I’ve ever seen from a politician.”

ABOVE: On a lighter note, here’s the classic, Sarah Palin question: “What is it, exactly, that the VP does every day?”

ABOVE: A video on aerial shooting of wolves in Alaska, along with a call to Governor Palin (who supports this brutal program) to stop supporting this program.

ABOVE: Ah, Troopergate… Abuse of power or maverick, executive decision? You decide.

ABOVE: We suspect that Joe Lieberman is the scarf man with the scary voice in this Palin expose.

ABOVE: Would win 1st Prize in our Sarah Palin Maverick Impersonator pageant.

ABOVE: Okay, so this isn’t Sarah, either. Or is it?  (Compare Miss SC Teen USA’s discourse with Sarah Palin’s ruminations on oil and the Iraq War: “When I talk about, umm, the plan for the war, you know, let’s make sure we have a plan here, and respecting McCain’s position on that.”)

 

HERE’S WHAT THE OTHERS ARE SAYING:

ABOVE: Jack Cafferty (Tell us what you really think, Jack!)

ABOVE: Bill Maher

Karl Rove disses Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine’s credentials (a Harvard law school grad, who has been governor for 3 years) as being inadequte for the VP slot. Wonder if Karl Rove has any thoughts on Sarah Palin’s credentials?

ABOVE: James Carville & McCain campaign adviser, Nancy Pfotenhauer (feverishly making a case for Palin) weigh in on Larry King. Unlike Obama, seen on this clip, Pfotenhauer can’t seem to bring herself to show even a mote of graciousness. The lady doth protest too much.

 

ABOVE: Keith Olbermann & Rachel Maddow talk about Palin’s record

ABOVE: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert (Daily Show/Colbert Report) Talk Palin

–> CLICK HERE TO BE TRANSMOGRAPHIED TO THE COMEDY CENTRAL SITE <–

ABOVE: Comedy Central/Daily Show — Karl Rove, Dick Morris, Nancy Pfotenhauer and Sarah Palin, herself, play the old double standard, pitting Sarah Palin vs. Tim Kaine, Jamie Lynn Spears and Hillary Clinton   

ABOVE: From MSNBC, conservative commentators, Noonan and Murphy, after they’re’re off the air (and not aware their mikes are still live), say what they really think about the veep choice.

ABOVE: CNN’s Roland Martin rips Palin’s ridicule of community organizers.

LASTLY…. A FEW LINKS:

What’s up with this? Early in her tenure as mayor of Wasilla, Sarah Palin was nearly recalled for firing the police chief and the town librarian. Not because they were doing a bad job, nor (heaven forbid) because both had supported Palin’s opponent in the mayoral election (and, according to other sources, because the librarian resisted Palin’s “rhetorical question” about censorship/removing *certain books from the library and because the police chief changed a local bar’s closing hour from 5 a.m. to earlier, due to rowdiness). According to Palin, however, she didn’t feel she had their full support. ”You know in your heart when someone is supportive of you,” she said. Perhaps this was also a factor in her firing of Alaska’s public safety commissioner, Walt Monegan, after his refusal to fire Palin’s ex-brother-in-law.   http://www.washingtonindependent.com/3671/the-reform-candidate

Politico: Why the Media Should Apologize – On behalf of the media, I would like to say we are sorry. On behalf of the elite media, I would like to say we are very sorry. We have asked questions this week that we should never have asked. We have asked pathetic questions like: Who is Sarah Palin? What is her record? Where does she stand on the issues? And is she is qualified to be a heartbeat away from the presidency? We have asked mean questions like: How well did John McCain know her before he selected her? How well did his campaign vet her? And was she his first choice….

McClatchy: Official: Palin’s never issued an order to Alaska Guard

SameFacts.com: Palin vs. Reality: Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts.

TIME: Swampland/Angry Amateurs: The story of the day out here in Minneapolis is the McCain campaign’s war against the press. This has been building for some time. Those of us who have criticized the candidate–and especially those of us who enjoyed good relations with McCain in the past–have been subject to off-the-record browbeating and attempted bullying all year. But things have gotten much worse in recent days: there was McCain’s rude, bizarre interview with Time Magazine last week. Yesterday, McCain refused to an interview with Larry King, for God’s sake, because Campbell Brown had been caught in the commission of journalism on CNN the night before….

Careful, you angry elitist democrats out there…. according to the latest Rasmussen Reports poll, if the media criticizes Sarah Palin, it makes people want to vote for her even more: Over half of U.S. voters (51%) think reporters are trying to hurt Sarah Palin with their news coverage, and 24% say those stories make them more likely to vote for Republican presidential candidate John McCain in November.

CBS News: Fake Soldiers Used In RNC Video: It was a video that was supposed to elicit soaring patriotism and real emotions about the Pledge of Allegiance. But to do that, it used fake soldiers and a staged military funeral instead of the real thing. (good news is, no soldiers were harmed during the filming of this video, eh?)

LosAngelesTimes: Palin: wrong woman, wrong message – Sarah Palin shares nothing but a chromosome with Hillary Clinton. She is Phyllis Schlafly, only younger.

ABC News: Fired Alaskan Official Says Palin Hasn’t Been Truthful – The fired Alaskan official, whose dismissal has become the subject of a state senate committee’s investigation of Gov. Sarah Palin, has told ABC News that she has not been entirely truthful on the matter.

fivethirtyeight: Cognitive Dissonance – Virtually all of the conservative commentariat, and a greater-than-would-care-to-admit-it share of the liberal commentariat think that Sarah Palin hit a home run tonight. I guess I’m just going to have to stick my neck out (along with Josh Marshall) and disagree. (p.s. this website, which bills its goods as “electoral projections done right,” is a great site for tracking and comparison)

WashingtonMonthly: Factchecking Palin – I thought Palin’s speech was quite good: well-written, well delivered. And, as I said earlier, I think she’s a genuinely engaging person, and comes across very well. There were just a couple of problems. One, which I have seen people notice, but which I suspect won’t be a big deal for a lot of voters, is that it had very little substance. The other, which the commenters I saw on TV for some reason neglected to mention, was that she told a lot of lies. (Note: the lies are listed, with reponsible updates given, where applicable).

AnchorageDailyNews: Some of Palin’s remarks stretch the truth – SPEECH: Gas pipeline, earmark issues have more subtlety than described. Gov. Sarah Palin’s remarks to the Republican National Convention about her record in state government stretched the truth.