Posts Tagged ‘fearmongering’
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself—nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. — from Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1933 inaugural address
It may or may not be a coincidence that census worker Bill Sparkman was found dead with a rope around his neck on 9-12 — the word “FED” scrawled across his chest — on the same day that Glenn Beck’s “9-12 Project” descended on Washington, where the teabaggers, deathers and birthers gathered to protest what Beck & Bachmann have warned are “the systematic efforts” by everyone from Obama Administration and certain Democratic members of Congress, to health care reformers, environmentalists and the folk at with the U.S. Census,”to destroy our wonderful country and threaten to wipe away our God gifted liberties.”
And it may or may not be a coincidence that Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, Lou Dobbs, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Steele, Michele Bachmann and other Capitol Hill GOPs have used the media and organizations such as Glenn Beck’s the “9-12 Project” as a forum for exercising their own “God gifted liberties” to stoke fear, hatred and conspiratorial disinformation about the Federal government, in general, and the U.S. Census, in particular — as if this 220-year-old, constitutionally mandaded U.S. Census (Article I, Section 2) were somehow a recent invention by the Obama Administration, designed to intrude into our lives and impose Nazi, socialist of communist (take your pick) control over the citizenry:
Certainly the collection of this information is going to be part of an ongoing political campaign by this administration. — RNC Chairman Michael Steele on the U.S. Census
I’ve made it very public what my position is, and I think there is a point when you say ‘enough is enough’ to government intrusion. — Michele Bachmann, explaining her plan to boycott the U.S. census
Can they, um, because I’ve considered not filling it out when I get it, but I want to make sure that they don’t use this as a loophole to say that I can no longer have a permit for my gun. — Glenn Beck, during his interview with Michele Bachmann, hinting that the Feds might take away his 2nd Amendment rights, should he refuse to fill out his census forms — even as both have have just factually acknowledged that the Census Bureau’s stated fine for such is between $100-$5,000.
It is of no coincidence, however, that a certain percentage of citizens in this country have fallen under the spell of this “nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror” that has been spun by these GOP peddlers of terror, who have suggested that the census will be used by the Obama Administration to intrude into their lives, take away their guns and throw them into internment camps (the latter fear is courtesy of Michele Bachmann). A sampling of comments from Beck’s “9-12 Project” website reveals the extent of the terror, anger and hatred felt by their audience:
AMMO UP!!! I suggest ammo you don’t use yourself also. Never know when someone else could use it or trade for goods! Buy cheap/inexpensive ammo. I have my .308, .40 and 5.56.
I always thought they could only ask 2 questions? I am prepared for jail time! These are incredible times.
Why is the “census” so important right now? Two guess, [sic] it is the control this administration wants !
With the economy down and so many people out of work and worrying, the Dems are doing their best to side track this country . This is a cruel administration and it is doing everything it can to undermine our American way of life.
I think the best way to fight this, is to not participate in it. If it is going to be political and not fair anyway, why contribute to the fraud. When you get your census, just mark it, I refuse to answer these questions due to probable fraud.
Time to be sqirrels [sic] or whatever else cracks acorns. “When your [sic] a hammer, everything looks like a nail.”
We have allowed, yes allowed the left to push us around for far too long. We have bowed and bent to every politically correct, tree-hugging, capitalist hating scheme they’ve come up with for fear of being called a racist, homophobe, hatemonger. I tell you what, they don’t know what a hatemonger is. It’s time to push back.
No, it’s no coincidence that our country is ripe for a lynching. After all, the Becks, Bachmanns, Steeles, Wilsons and Limbaughs of America have spent the past year working on the GOP tag team, taking turns goading their audiences into stocking up on assault rifles, ammo and grudges.
It doesn’t have to be this way. There’s still time to make a U-turn before something truly horrible happens.
And since Bachmann, Beck, Dobbs, Steele, Wilson et al show no signs of changing the incendiary tone of their rhetoric, it is up to each of us, as individuals, to unequivocally reject the agenda they are promoting:
- first, by calling these people out — as have former president Jimmy Carter, Rep. John Lewis, Nancy Pelosi and others — whenever the rhetoric embraces hatred, threats and/or violence, and
- second, by taking every opportunity to allay fears with facts.
Here is my contribution:
FEAR: Bachman says that she does not feel “comfortable” giving her personal information to an ACORN worker.
* * * * *
FEAR: Michele Bachmann doesn’t understand why the government needs information, such as her phone number.
FACT: Had she actually bothered to seek an answer to this question, rather than rather than resort to passing on her fearful ignorance and suspicions, Rep. Bachmann would know the reason for each and every question, as these are painstakingly explained throughout the U.S. Census Bureau documentation, as well as on their website, including info on how long each question has existed on the census. Regarding phone numbers, these are requested in case the U.S. Census needs to contact those folks who didn’t properly fill out their forms. Calling these individuals on the phone saves the time and expense of sending a personal interviewer to the house. Oddly, Bachmann & Co. were silent over the Bush Administration’s wiretapping program, which made it legal for our government to listen into our private conversations, sans the formality of a warrant. Maybe it’s just me, but I feel more threatened by having the government listen into my phone calls, than by the rote gathering of phone numbers, which are available to anyone with just a few clicks of the mouse.
Worst-case scenario regarding phone numbers (should the above facts not allay Rep. Bachmann’s fears), according to the U.S. Census website, her phone number is not required by federal law, which she would know, had she bothered to look before leaping to conclusions.
* * * * *
FEAR: Michele Bachmann states that the U.S. Census short-form is 28 pages .
FACT: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, “The 2010 Census questionnaire will be one of the shortest in history, consisting of 10 questions. It takes about 10 minutes to complete.” The 2010 short-form is 6 pages long, with the aforementioned “10 questions” being covered on one single page. The other 5 pages allow optional space for documenting up to 12 other household members, if applicable, and requests only basic information, such as race, age, gender, etc.
* * * * *
FEAR: Michele Bachmann states that the U.S. Census short form is 28 pages .
FACT: Perhaps Rep. Bachmann, in her confusion, was referring to the 14-page American Community Survey (ACS) component of the U.S. Census, which went into effect during the Bush Administration, under a Republican majority Congress in 2005. The ACS replaced the now-obsolete U.S. Census “long census form,” which had been in use since 1940 and used on only a sampling of the population (5% of households in 1940, compared to 16% in the last several census counts). Today’s ACS asks essentially the same questions that were asked in the 100-question “long form” during the last two census counts, the only difference being that — rather than being used every 10 years, the ACS is (and has been since 2005) used on an ongoing basis every year. The theory is that, with our rapidly-changing demographic, economic, and housing data, there needs to be a more accurate system for tracking this data between censuses. (As an example of how rapidly our demographics change, the population increase from 1930 to 1940 was just under 9 million, whereas the population increase from 1990 to 2000 was nearly 33 million). Too, the ACS uses a smaller sampling of households. Unlike the previously used “long-form” which was sent to 1 in 6 households, the ACS has been sent to an average of 1 in 9 households over a 5-year period. For those who have questions on how to fill out the form, a 16-page instruction guide available, but even this (the 14 page questionaire +the 16 page info guide) doesn’t add up to 28 pages.
* * * * *
FEAR: Bachmann states that the census asks for the number of live births.
FACT: The census has never asked for the number of “live births,” although it does seem logical that — since the primary goal over its 220-year history has been to keep an accurate count of the U.S. population — there would be at least some question directed toward tracking birthrates. Perhaps Rep. Bachmann was referring to question #23 (left) which has been part of the U.S. Census for 80 of the past 110 years. This information is reportedly used both to project population growth, as well as to serve as a planning tool for the Dept. of Health and Human Services to implement programs, per statutes. (see this U.S. Census Bureau pdf document for more specifics on this)
* * * * *
FEAR: Bachmann states that the census asks how many bathrooms you have.
FACT: No census has ever asked how many bathrooms a person has. The census has asked, since 1940, whether a household has plumbing. This information is asked on the ACS form, not the short-form, which most households will receive. This information is used for various reasons, such as gauging poverty, determing risks for groundwater contamination, and for policy development by the U.S. Dept of Housing and Urban Development. (see this U.S. Census pdf document for specifics on this).
* * * * *
FEAR: Bachman states that the census asks what time you leave for work and come home.
FACT: This question has been part of the census since 1960, and is one of several regarding transporation and the use of public highways. According to the U.S. Census:
“Transportation planners, using journey-to-work information, to plan for peak volumes of traffic in order to reduce traffic congestion, plan for parking, and develop strategies, such as carpooling programs and flexible work schedules. Decisions are made to build new roads or add capacity to existing roads, and to develop transit systems, such as light rail or subways, by projecting future needs.” Check the U.S. Census site (see pg. 35 of this 65-page pdf to both view the actual questions and to get more info on why this information is collected).
As Rep. Bachmann could attest, it would be much easier — and certainly less intrusive — for the U.S. Dept. of Transportation to simply pull this data out of thin air, as she does with so many of her “facts.” However, this approach is not particularly helpful to transporation planners when designing the highway and mass transit infrastructures that our government provides equally to all citizens, in much the same way that all American citizens are given equal access — regardless of income, disability, ethnicity, country of origin, gender, age or race — to public schools, fire departments, law enforcement and, hopefully one day, health care.
* * * * *
FEAR: Michele Bachmann states that the U.S. Census does not ask if people are U.S. citizens.
FACT: The U.S. Census has been asking this very question for most of the past 180 years, beginning in 1820, when it was #13 of thirty-three questions, asking specifially for the “number of foreigners not naturalized” in the household. As Bachmann has also expressed some fear over the government’s interest in asking about age (part of the census since 1800), race (part of the census since 1790) and gender (part of the census since 1790) , it may be of interest to note that all but five of the 1820 census questions were devoted to asking the gender and ages of whites, slaves and “free colored persons.” For the record, question #8 on the 2010 census plainly asks, “Is this person a citizen of the United States?” Also, in April of this year, the U.S. Census acting director, Thomas Mesenbourg, announced to the media, “We’ll Work with ‘Community Organizations’ to Count All Illegal Aliens in 2010.”
* * * * *
FEAR: Michelle Bachmann fears that information from the census will be used to round up Americans into internment camps, (as was done to Japanese and other immigrants in 1942, in the wake of the bombing of Pearl Harbor), and states that she wishes that the FBI, instead of the White House, were in charge of the census.
FACT: First of all, the the U.S. Census Bureau operates through the Department of Commerce, not the executive branch of the government, nor ACORN. Regarding the FBI’s role with the census, beginning in 1939, it was the FBI who used the information from the U.S. Census to profile Japanese and other immigrants and to eventually “round up” Japanese, Italians, Germans and Jews into internment camps, per an executive order signed by Roosevelt in 1942. The U.S. government officially apologized for this and awarded $1.6 billion in reparations in 1988, with President Ronald Reagan stating, as he signed the legislation, that the government’s actions had been based on “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”
The reason there was no mention of the U.S. Census in Reagan’s apology is because it was anti-immigration fervor — not the census — that ultimately led to these internment camps. The pity is that folk like Bachmann — having neglected to learn their history before speaking authoritatively on it — doom the rest of us to re-witness our most despicable histories. A good starting point for absorbing some historical perspective on the internment camps is the draft for an article, written by Eleanor Roosevelt, aptly titled, To Undo A Mistake Is Always Harder Than Not to Create One Originally.
What Michele Bachmann, in her defiant ignorance, failed to tell her audience is what actually led to the internment camps. It was certainly not the census. It was, in great part, the culmination of 150 years of xenophobic fear and hatred toward Asians — stoked by the Bachmanns & Becks of the day — that was nearly as old as our country, itself, beginning with the Naturalization Act of 1790, which barred U.S. citizenship not only to slaves and blacks, but to Asians. This law was followed throughout the 19th and early 20th century with various Alien Land Laws, which barred the ownership, leasing or renting of land by those residents who were ineligible to citizenship (read that: slaves, blacks and Asians). The Naturalization Act of 1790 was amended in 1875 to allow citizenship to Africans, still barring citizenship to Asians.
This nativist hatred of “the yellow peril” only intensified during the 60 years leading up to WWII and the internment camps — with anti-Chinese, anti-Japanese sentiments being epidemic from the 1880s through the 1940s, along side the existing prejudices against blacks, Jews and Catholics. This period saw the passage of a series of laws directed specifically against Chinese, Japanese and/or Filipino immigration — from the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 (which barred Chinese labor and immigration), to the Gentleman’s Agreement of 1907 (in which Japan agreed to not allow its citizens to emigrate to the U.S.), to Immigration Act of 1917 (which barred immigrants from most of Asia), to the Quota Law of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924 (both of which sharply reduced the immigration of Catholics, Jews and the Japanese, who were deemed “aliens inelibible to citizenship,” with the 1924 act finally barring Japanese immigration entirely). Anti-immigration became, in the wake of WWI, the cause célèbre of the KKK and other nativist groups and fraternal orders of the day, which targeted immigrants for intimidation, threats and lynching, the most infamous being, perhaps, the 1915 KKK lynching of the Jewish pencil manufacturer, Leo Frank..
As the Depression descended during the early 1930s, job scarcity only escalated the anger and fear toward immigrants — not unlike the climate being cultivated today in the rhetoric of Beck, Bachmann, Dobbs and others — with the rise of WWII facism only seeming to justify old fears, while also justifying new fears of subversive facist and communist elements within the U.S. In 1939-1940, the FBI began the “Custodial Detention Index Program,” which targeted not only the Japanese and Chinese, but also Italians, Germans and Jews, categorizing these immigrants into several classes of “subversives.”
With the Japanese bombing of Pearl Harbor — and the U.S. officially at war with Japan — long-simmering hatred toward Japanese escalated to a flash-point, sparking both threats and actual acts of violence against Japanese-Americans. From this specific climate and turn of events, Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the order to authorize the internment of Japanese Americans.
It was not until the 1950s-60s that the anti-immigration laws barring citizenship and land ownership to the Japanese began to be lifted. Speaking before Congress in 1960, Senator Warren G. Magnuson — who, himself, had earlier been a proponent of the Japanese internment camps — urged a repeal of the alien land laws, describing the climate of fear that had led to these laws and, ultimately, to the internment camps:
I am convinced that these anti-alien land laws helped substantially to create the prejudices which were fanned by hysteria in 1942, into and incident that has been described as ‘our worst wartime mistake.’ I have referenced to the mass military evacuation of 110,000 persons of Japanese ancestry, regardless of citizenship, age, or sex from their homes into interior interment camps.
It was not until the Immigration Act of 1965 that barriers against Japanese immigration were effectively lifted, allowing the Japanese an equal path with other nationalities to citizenship and, thereby, putting to rest 175-years of laws that served to legitimize prejudice within our immigration policies.
It is of no coincidence that the Immigration Act of 1965 coincided with the Civil Rights and Votings Rights Acts of 1964-65, which afforded, after some 250 years, equal rights of citizenship to blacks. But as any white supremacist could tell you, it’s one thing to make a law; it’s another to enforce it. There continue to be in this country certain elements that work, like rust, to undermine the rights of non-whites. Harry Dent picked up the cause for white supremacist politicians in 1964, passing the torch to Lee Atwater in the 1980s, then to Karl Rove. Today, this same torch is being carried by Glenn Beck, Michelle Bachmann and, by virtue of their silence on the matter, by the entire Republican Party, who are exploiting old fears to further political agendas — stoking fear, hatred and, potentially, violence in the process.
To borrow from the words that came back to haunt Roosevelt, “the only thing we have to fear is fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror.” It is this fear that ultimately led to the internment camps, and it is this fear — not the existence of the U.S. census — that could ultimately doom us, as a country, to repeat old history.
* * * * *
America’s history with race and immigration is infinitely complex. I can no more do justice to this history in five or six paragraphs than Bachman, Beck, Limbaugh or Dobbs can lend in the various one-liners they broadcast over the airwaves each day, their dire predictions designed to raise ratings and political capital, entirely at the expense of the people they terrify and the victims who pay the price of this terror.
Henchmen to Road Rage? To a Lynching?
To date, we don’t know. But the fact that we are even asking these questions speaks volumes about the fears that have been cavalierly tossed about and taken root over the past year or so.
This is how history repeats itself — by the perpetuation of old fears and old ignorance. It has taken me several hours to track down the facts and write them here for public consumption to set the record straight on just a tiny fraction of the irresponsible disinformation that it took Glenn Beck and Michele Bachmann just a few minutes to broadcast to a national audience.
That’s the thing about terror. It clutches at peoples’ hearts, entirely by-passing their minds, propelling them into survival mode. They’ll do whatever it takes to protect themselves from the enemy, the bogeyman. These terrified folk don’t ask questions. They believe what their politicians tell them. They believe what they hear on the TV box. They believe, with all their hearts, that the government is, in the words of Glenn Beck, out to “destroy our wonderful country and threaten to wipe away our God gifted liberties.” Too, there are a certain percentage who may know better, but are, indeed, acting on old hatreds.
From there, all it takes is a small spark. Perhaps an angry man in a pick-up truck who, seeing my Obama bumper sticker, rushes up behind my car on a rural road in South Carolina, threatening to rear-end my car, then nearly side-swipes me as he tries to run me off the road. Or, perhaps, a simple knock on the door by a census worker. That’s all it would take to incite the sort of rage that would compel men to murder complete strangers or to, perhaps, lynch a Boy Scout leader, a cancer survivor, a teacher, a single father to a son.
Whether or not the truth of the latter is fact or fear is a question that has yet to be answered. But it is a question that more and more American face each day — from the President, to members of Congress, to ordinary citizens like myself. It is a terrifying question, to be sure — one that no one should ever, ever again have to ask in this country. Yet, there are some in this country who would doom us to repeat it.
Again, it’s not too late. We can still make that U-turn before something truly horrible happens if, indeed, it hasn’t already.
VIDEO ABOVE: Michele Bachmann’s approach to stopping health care reform: “We have to today make a covenant, slit our wrists, be blood brothers on this thing. This will not pass. We will do whatever it takes to make sure this doesn’t pass.”
VIDEO ABOVE: The Young Turks show broadcast on some of Michele Bachmann’s more bizarre statements, including her “slit our wrists” covenant, from the previous video.
by Mantis Katz for the canarypapers
It’s been two weeks, and folks are still scratching their heads: What’s the real reason she’s quitting? I, too, am scratching my head: Why is everyone so mystified? The answer is as plain as day. Anyone who listened to that speech and heard only a rambling mishmash of illogical justifications for quitting her job either wasn’t listening or doesn’t know squat about the impending apocalypse.
Alaska’s mission? To contribute to America. We’re strategic in the world as the air crossroads of the world, as a gatekeeper of the continent. And bold visionaries, they knew this, and they knew that Alaska would be part of America’s great destiny. — from Sarah Palin’s resignation speech, July 3, 2009
The fact that her speech did, indeed ramble is due to the fact that Sarah’s mission was not to deliver a coherent explanation as to why she is quitting the governorship but, rather, to signal her intended audience that she is preparing to take the next “next step.”
Flashing this signal necessitated dropping specific key words and phrases into the text of her speech: words that are — much like a dog whistle — silent to all but those attuned to hearing such things. This is to say that her dog whistles were her message, in entirety, with the words in-between being completely superfluous.
Cutting to the quick, here’s a rough translation of Sarah Palin’s speech: The end times are near, and since God has appointed me, Sarah Palin, to oversee the affair, I’m stepping down from the governorship so that I may take the next step: preparing America for its destiny, as I’ve for Alaska over the past 3 years. Working from the White House, I can better tend to this greater destiny of our nation: aggressively developing our abundant natural resources and their wealth; “progressing” our laws and our Constitution to reflect our values as a Christian nation; and paving America’s path to the Rapture — the gates to which are in Alaska, which has been prophesied to serve as the refuge state, God’s alpha and omega, during the apocalypse.
We have John McCain to thank for this.
In June 2008, McCain — desperate to corner the fundamentalist Christian vote to fix his flagging poll numbers — flew to North Carolina and met with Billy Graham and his son, Franklin, a fixture on the Alaskan evangalical circuit. Here, it is believed, Franklin Graham countered McCain’s request with a price tag, of sorts: a Christian-approved candidate for the VP slot. Their meeting was sealed with a prayer for “God’s will to be done in the upcoming election.” Whatever the impetus, McCain plucked Palin from her relative anonymity and cast her onto the national stage, an event seen by the end-times evangelicals — and by Sarah, herself — as prophesy, a signpost from God. Her role on the McCain ticket is seen as but one stepping stone on the path to her ultimate destiny: working for the government of God, through the government of man, in the White House. As any evangelist worth her salt could tell you, God’s law supercedes all man-made laws and designs.
I want you to please pray for Sarah, for Governor Sarah– there were some things about the natural resources, about the state, there were some things that God wants to tap into to be a refuge for the lower 48 –and I believe that Alaska’s one of the refuge states, come on you guys, in the last days, and hundreds of thousands of people are going to come to the state to seek refuge, and the church has to be ready to minister to them. Amen? So could you pray for our governor and what she’s requested? — excerpt from the prayer spoken over Sarah Palin in June 2008 by the pastor of the Wasilla Assembly of God.
God directs the affairs of Man and is the ultimate authority over human events. — belief statement from the website of the “Alaska Governors Prayer Breakfast,” an annual “Family” event.
Sarah Palin, George W. Bush & Doug Coe: One Big Happy Family
To understand the connection between Sarah Palin’s resignation and the apocalypse, it helps to first understand Sarah Palin’s connection with “The Family,” aka, the Fellowship. Specifically, it helps to understand the inner workings of the “church” on C-Street that recently gained noteriety — not only for its role in the adultery scandals of Gov. Mark Sanford and Sen. John Ensign and former Congressman Chip Pickering, but also for the “surprising political connections” and the disturbing speeches of Family leader, Doug Coe.
It also helps to understand that, in the eyes of Family leader Doug Coe, human beings people belong in one of three camps: the “chosen ones,” the masses, and “enemies of Jesus.” John McCain had the misfortune, during the 2000 election, of falling into the latter camp, simply by virute of running opposite George Bush, who was seen by the self-named Christian Mafia being their best hope for total control since the founding of the United States.
A senator who incurred the wrath of the Fellowship and its allies was the man who challenged George W. Bush for the Republican presidential nomination in 2000 – John McCain. After McCain beat Bush in New Hampshire, the right-wing evangelicals pulled out all the stops to nail McCain on their home turf – South Carolina. Christian operatives associated with Karl Rove, Ralph Reed, and South Carolina’s Bob Jones University began spreading rumors – through “push polls,” e-mail, sermons, and word-of-mouth that McCain fathered an illegitimate “black girl” out of wed lock (a reference to his adopted Bangladeshi daughter), that he was a traitor while a prisoner of war in North Vietnam, that his wife Cindy was a druggie, and that he was gay. The gambit paid off. McCain was trounced by Bush in South Carolina and Bush went on to win the Republican nomination. For the Christian mafia, Bush was their best hope for total control since the founding of the United States. — from EXPOSÉ: THE “CHRISTIAN” MAFIA: Where Those Who Now Run the U.S. Government Came From and Where They Are Taking Us, by Wayne Madsen
The Family holds similar hopes for Sarah Palin and, as such, began grooming her for the vice-presidency long before McCain made his June 2008 visit, hat in hand, to court Franklin Graham for the Christian fundamentalist vote. Sarah’s debut into the VP arena actually began in early 2007, when self-described “political junkie” and “Messianic Judaist” blogger, Adam Brickley, started a website “palinforvp.blogspot.com.” Brickley described his “discovery” of Palin as the result of an internet-Wikipedia search for viable Republican candidates, with “the hand of God” playing a role in choosing Palin. “The longer I worked on it,” he said, “the less I felt I was driving it. Something else was at work.”
The Ubiquitous Hand
While the story of Brickley’s happenstance discovery of Palin on Wikipedia, via the hand of God, makes for good copy on the populist front, the fact is that Brickley, himself, had already been groomed for the job. No stranger to Washington, Brickley has attended workshops, received scholarships and training, and has interned for several prominent ultra-conservative, Christian fundamentalist groups in Washingon, including the Leadership Institute, the Young America’s Foundation and the Heritage Institute.
Associating these groups (or, for that matter, any organization, church, politician, dictator, CEO, lobbyist or evangelical) with The Family is, by design, convoluted. The Family collects no dues, wears no robes, maintains no official membership roster, nor even a website. And while their mission is decidedly ultra-conservative, American and evangelical in nature, those who stand under the umbrella of The Family come from all religions, faiths, nationalities and political persuasions. Not all who work for The Family are members, per se, nor have even heard of The Family or know the nature of its work. As a body, The Family is amorphous. It is the sum total of all its parts, with each part contributing to the Fellowship’s work — even as they may operate independently of and/or be entirely oblivious to the greater, collective cause they are serving. It is their contribution to this cause that binds them to the body. It makes no difference whether their contribution is intentional or incidental, so long as it serves a role in promoting what author Jeff Sharlet describes as “Bibilical capitalism”:
They think capitalism is ordained in the Bible, but at the same time, they say that capitalism is the “wedge”—it’s the wedge with which we introduce the gospel. They are very blunt. They recognize that capitalism is this very powerful and appealing force for governments that want to get in on that market, and the Family has all these connections. We can help you. We can bring businessmen your way. Yosemite, meet AES, the largest energy corporation in the world. Jordan, meet Raytheon, the defense contractor. Part of Biblical capitalism is that they believe that the gospel and capitalism travel together. So ultimately, they say, it is about your soul, but you are going to come to us through the market, and then your soul will be okay. — Jeff Sharlet in a 2008 interview with “Guernica”
Beyond educated guesses, it is difficult to peg any particular group or individual as working — officially or otherwise — under the Fellowship’s umbrella, except by connecting the dots. The guesswork is less so to those who recognize the language — the dog-whistle rhetoric, which serves as a secret handshake, of sorts. Ears perk up when political, religious and business leaders rail against:
Socialism, communism, feminism, environmentalism, government regulations, equal opporunity, gay rights, abortion, gun control, immigration, Arabs & Muslims (= terrorits), labor unions, food stamps, school lunch programs, Big Government takeovers, stimulus dollars, the Washington elite, Democrats, liberals, intellectuals, and the evil liberal media.
Ears perk up at the mention of:
God, 9-11, patriotism, creationism, the flag, school prayer, the Bible, the pledge of allegiance, red-blooded (read that: white) Americans, pro-American values, family values, Christian values, America as a Christian nation, God’s will, prayer warfare, spiritual warriors, destiny, freedom, liberty, faith-based initiatives, states’ rights, sucession, individual wealth, unregulated free market capitalism, tea bag parties, privatization, exploiting/developing our natural resources, AIPAC, aggressive foreign policies and war, hardworking Americans, and (thinly-cloaked) innuendo against lazy poor people, minorities and people of other cultures.
Mark Sanford, at an April 15th tea party earlier this year, squeaking out an impressive range of dog-whistles to a receptive, all-white audience.
That these masses so eagerly yip and yap to the sound of these whistles — entirely oblivious to the real nature of the causes to which they swear blind allegiance — has only made them unwitting armies for Doug Coe’s Family, which succeeds entirely at the expense of the masses. It is no mystery why those who associate with The Family don’t blatantly tout their ties to the group. (Based on my own research, however, if I were to compile a list of likely Family associates, I’d be inclined to draw heavily from the list of ultra-conservative groups listed on the website Free Range Talk) This secrecy is crucial to the success of Doug Coe’s so-called “Christian Mafia,” which is no secret to anyone who has heard Doug Coe speak on the topic:
His body [Christ’s body] functions invisibly like the mafia…. The more you can keep your organization invisible, the more influence it will have. —from “The Family” (pg. 21) by Jeff Sharlet
Adam Brickley’s Wikipedia folk tale about the discovery of Sarah Palin makes invisible, all right, the hand that was behind her selection. Similarly invisible was the hand that sent cruise ships filled with Washington ultra-conservative politicians and media elitists to visit Sarah during the summer of 2007, as was detailed in the New Yorker article, “The Insiders: How John McCain Came to Pick Sarah Palin.” The topics du jour were oil exploration and Sarah’s struggles with environmentalists. On the guest lists were: Robert Bork (federal judge), John Bolton (George W. Bush’s former U.N. ambassador); Victor Davis Hanson (a favorite Dick Cheney historian); Michael Gerson (former chief speechwriter for George W. Bush); William (Bill) Kristol; Fox News executives; and, last but not least, political consultant, Dick Morris, who had the foresight to peg Palin as a VP hopeful during his August 2007 visit. As Morris would later recall:
“I will always remember taking her aside and telling her that she might one day be tapped to be Vice-President, given her record and the shortage of female political talent in the Republican Party. She will make one hell of a candidate, and hats off to McCain for picking her.”
While McCain may have been naive to the invisible hand pushing Sarah into the VP slot, he was at least savvy to the fact that the only means to courting the Christian fundamentalist vote was to accept the terms of Franklin Graham’s offer. In another lifetime, this ultimatum would have been too reprehensible to accept; and had McCain not felt pushed into a corner, it’s fairly certain he would have made a more sensible choice: a running mate whose credentials and political resume were in keeping with his own agenda and values, instead of an evangelical populist. By summer’s end, however, McCain’s campaign had unraveled out of his control (via the demise of hope for a McCain-Liebermann ticket, the sagging poll numbers, and the lack of vibrant VP contendees, as contrasted with the vibrancy of the Obama ticket), forcing his hand.
McCain’s erratic nature, tabbed as maverickhood, coupled with his desperation played no small part in the events of late August 2008. Going for broke, he chose Sarah Palin — the last-resort option to save his dying candidacy. To many, it seemed like a match made in heaven — Sarah Palin’s evangelical populism, along with her aggressive work on oil exploration and her opposition to science and environmental protection. According to Jeff Sharlet, it was an attempt to “marry populist fundamentalism to [the] elite free-market fundamentalism” of the Fellowship.
The union was equally fortuitious to the masses — those end-times evangelicals, who had been waiting for a sign. Facts are facts: Jesus can not and will not return from heaven until the evangelicals retake control of the earth from Satan. While the evangelicals had been, for years, making great strides on a global scale, they had yet to tap into the God’s destiny for the U.S., for the want of the *right* person and the *right* time. The evangelicals had been waiting for a sign. In August 2008, John McCain gave it to them.
That the McCain-Palin ticket lost was no stumbling block in the eyes of Sarah’s followers. In fact, it seemed to only reinforce the greatness of her calling, proving that her destiny was not to serve as vice-president, but as president. The McCain ticket was merely a stepping stone.
Which brings us to Sarah’s resignation speech and to her “next step.” In turning the reins of the state over to her like-minded colleague, Lt. Governor Sean Parnell, Sarah assures that the trail she’s blazed in Alaska will live on. Parnell will fight just as aggressively to develop Alaska’s oil, per God’s plan — cultivating earthly wealth for the righteous, while readying Alaska for the apocalypse and the attending influx of people from the lower 48 — freeing Sarah to do God’s work from “the outside” (Alaskan vernacular for the lower 48).
PHOTOS: (above) Sean Parnell and Sarah Palin during during the “One Lord Sunday” ceremony in June 2008, in which the two receive a laying of the hands from Pastor Ed Kalnins, the senior pastor of the Wasilla Assembly of God. (below) The Lt. Governor receives a hug from Sarah Palin after her resignation speech.
At the same time — and despite ample evidence to the contrary — Palin is no dummy. She knows that not all of us share her vision (not yet, anyway) and realizes the need to exercise some Coe-like stealth, regarding her work as a spiritual warrior, lest her reputation as an apocalyptic politician become, on the campaign trail, like a wad of gum stuck to the bottom of her shoe. She’s savvy enough to know that she cannot blaze a trail to the White House on a platform of end times prophesy.
In order to claim victory, she must (and already did in her July 3rd speech) re-ignite the mob mentality from her days on the McCain stump, stoking the wrath of that particular voting bloc that she affectionately calls, “real” Americans. You know them: those patriotic, hardworking Americans who emerged from Sarah’s stump speeches shouting “Nigger!” and “Kill him!” and “Socialist!” and “Commie fag!” You know them. They’re the very folk that Sarah conjured in her first speech on the national stage last September, when she opined:
A writer observed: “We grow good people in our small towns, with honesty, sincerity, and dignity.” I know just the kind of people that writer had in mind…. They are the ones who do some of the hardest work in America … They love their country, in good times and bad, and they’re always proud of America. – Sarah Palin at the Republican convention, Sept. 2008, quoting Westbrook Pegler, the racist, fascist, pro-Nazi, anti-semitic, pseudo-populist journalist/writer who openly wished for the assassinations of Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Robert Kennedy.
This is why, in her resignation speech, it was necessary for Sarah to also give a few good bleats of her dog whistle to her base — those honest, sincere, dignified, hardworking, proud Americans (e.g. sucessionists & states’ rights activists, garden-variety Christians and anti-abortion activists, plus those who oppose the evil liberal media, debt-ridden stimulus dollars and Big Government Spending).
We’ll likely never be offered an explantion from Sarah’s voting bloc, as to why they chose to sit on their hands while the Bush-Cheney Administration decimated the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and plundered our economy to historic depths (driving our country to its knees, creating massive unemployment, bank failures, the demise of businesses, bankruptcy, foreclosures, hunger, homelessness, etc.) but yet were inspired to fight to the death for America last fall…..
…. And then again (as seen below) in the wake of the Obama’s inauguration, as they vociferously raised their hands in protest at tea bag parties — fearmongering conspiracy theories about a socialist, Big Government takeover.
These most rabid defenders of Doug Coe’s Family values don’t know — and perhaps wouldn’t care — that they are, to men like Coe, mere putty. They are of no consequence beyond the votes, money and anger they contribute to empower the politicians, the corporatate heads, the evangelical leaders: the chosen ones.
Mere putty: the tea baggers, the evangelical churches and their missions, the Christian fundamentalists, the mobs at Palin rallies, the white supremacist groups, the pro-American pontificators…. They are the masses about which Doug Coe spoke: those to whom God’s wealth is not intended; those to whom (let them eat cake) the Bible is intended, as opposed to the chosen ones, to whom God speaks directly.
This is because the Fellowship is not about fellowship or even religion, per se. It is about serving as conduits for power, wealth and influence to the select few. It is about a future where “everything — sex and taxes, war and the price of oil — will be decided upon not according to democracy or the church or even Scripture” but by the government of Christ’s will, as channeled through the “chosen ones.”
The chosen ones, as such, are not expected to adhere to man-made laws or man-made ethics — hence the plain-faced hyporcrisy of Family member evangelicals caught in adultery or embezzlement scandals; hence the disregard that ultra-conservatives hold for the U.S. Constitution, even as they present themselves as the most rabid defenders of liberty, freedom, America and the constitution.
Mere putty. For all their talk of being pro-American, Sarah’s voting bloc never runs out of justifications for trampling the U.S. Constitution — their justifications gleaned from dog-whistling politicians and religious zealots, who know just the right words to incite the sort of xenophobic, rasict, socialist fears that will compel large swaths of the population to defy not only logic, but their own individual and/or finanacial interests.
If we learned nothing in the campaign of 2008, we learned that Sarah Palin has a unique gift for inspiring the masses, who will as gladly snuff out the life of Sarah’s opponents as they would trample the Constitution.
And they trample the environment with equal fervor, as crapping up the environment is no sin to end-timers. In fact, destruction only brings us closer to the Rapture — to that perfect, glorious day when Jesus returns. By the same token plague, famine, global warming, oil instability and wars — especially as they involve Israel — are also embraced as stepping stones to the Rapture. Under this doctrine, nuclear armageddon is not only inevitable, it’s a good thing.
Scripture specifically mentions oil instability as a sign of the Rapture. We’re seeing more and more oil wars. The contractions of the fulfilment of prophecies are getting tighter and tighter. I’m looking out the window and I can see it’s going to rain. I’m just looking at the turmoil of the world, Iraq, other places – everywhere people are fighting against Christ.”– September 2008 quote from Pastor Ed Kalnins of the Wasilla Assembly of God, musing on the coming Rapture. While he declined to set an exact date, he said that he hopes it will be in his lifetime.
That evangelicals such as Sarah Palin and Doug Coe believe that God has appointed them to these particular missions is no less terrifying than the missions undertaken by those who believe, just as earnestly, that their god has appointed them to fly airplanes into buildings.
As for the rest of us…
… those of all other faiths, non-faiths and persuasions who struggle to ensure equal rights and opportunities for all the citizens of the world, and to respect and protect all of humanity and the earth we inhabit (or, alternately, to just simply live our lives in benign complacency) … well, just ask Doug Coe and Sarah Palin, and they’ll tell you: we are the anti-Americans, we are the idol-worshippers, we are the terrorists, we are the socialists, we are the elitists, we are the evil liberal media, we are, in the words of Doug Coe, the “enemies of Jesus.”
Re-Visiting Sarah’s Words
Reading the text and/or viewing the video of Sarah Palin’s resignation speech (available here, on a separate canarypapers page) may give readers better insight and understanding into Sarah’s choice of words and, ultimately, the reasons behind her resignation speech. Or not.
In tentatively ending here (this post is a work in progress) I offer the following two quotes. The first is excerpted from a letter I received last fall in response to one of my posts about Sarah Palin. The second quote is from a book details the role that each of our 50-states will play, according to evangelical prophesy, as our country prepares for the end times. First, the letter, which I titled, “A Letter from Someone Who Grew Up with Sarah Palin’s Pastor:
I grew up with Palin’s current pastor and was indoctrinated from birth in the evangelical movement. Evangelicals believe the end time is at hand at that Jesus will return any day. The long-term view on matters of global warming, environment, hunger, health, etc. are viewed quite differently when you don’t expect to remain on this planet.
Furthermore, as the name “evangelical” suggests, the God’s calling to the born again is to bring others to Him. No other belief is correct. All must come to Jesus and be born again. If they don’t, they will burn in hell – their just reward. Intolerance of other beliefs is the hallmark of the evangelical world.
Evangelicals want us to be taught their philosophy of creationism as a science in our schools. They can, as Palin does, totally disregard hard science in the furtherance of creationism.
They believe God (their God) should be at the center of government. They believe we should be praying to their God in our schools. They believe that literature and art not to their liking should be banned. —
Excerpt from A Letter from Someone Who Grew Up with Sarah Palin’s Pastor, October 1, 2008
Lastly, a quote from the book, “Releasing the Prophetic Destiny of a Nation,” which harks back to the quote from Sarah’s speech (seen above, at the beginning of this post), a dog-whistle that was echoed throughout the text of her speech:
The Lord says, “Alaska is the Gateway of the Nation to the Ancient of Days!” God has given Alaska an assignment as a sentinel and a vanguard for North America. Alaska will open doors for the glory of the Lord to sweep through North America. From Alaska, the Spirit of God will fall, and your people will be sent to train prophets and intercessors. New cycles will begin in Alaska. — From page 123 of the the book, “Releasing the Prophetic Destiny of a Nation: Discovering How Your Future Can Be Greater Than Your Past,”by Dutch Sheets and Chuck D. Pierce
by Mantis Katz for the canarypapers
NOTICE TO COMMENTERS: I routinely delete rabid, menacing and/or threatening letters from folk who, no matter what their persuasion, heap hatred and destruction on the rest of us folk. So don’t waste your time tapping-out angry epistles, because they’ll go unread.
Perhaps if the media hadn’t let McCain spend the first half of this year skating, unscathed, across the surface of the Obama-Clinton fracas, people might have noticed long before September that the McCain platform has nothing to offer but a thinly disguised repeat of the Bush-Cheney agenda. Perhaps, had McCain been acting, well, presidential all along, he wouldn’t find himself in the position he’s in today: backed into a corner with nothing to offer the American people but an ugly smear campaign, his only hope being that he can convince us that his opponent is a terrorist.
This tactic has played particularly ugly over the past several days, as we’ve watched McCain & Palin wage their scathing fearmongering tactics from the stump, whipping their audiences into hate-filled frenzies, punctuated with cries and jeers of “Kill him!” and “Terrorist!”
Um…. And just who’s the terrorist in this equation?
I watch a lot of news, and I read even more, so I was among the first to hear the unveiling of the new McCain-Palin campaign strategy this past weekend: “We are looking forward to turning a page on this financial crisis and getting back to discussing Mr. Obama’s aggressively liberal record and how he will be too risky for Americans.”
I heard that loud and clear. But what I didn’t hear from either McCain or Palin was a statement of condolence to Joe Biden on the passing of his mother-in-law. Nor did I hear either candidate pause during their hate-filled stump dictums to comment on yesterday’s plummeting Stock Market numbers. Nor did I hear any mention of the victims of this financial disaster — those suffering the collateral damage from this 8-year long financial orgy on Wall Street: the family of six in Los Angeles, all dead; and Addie Polk, the 90-year old woman in Ohio who, in despair, shot herself in the chest as sheriff’s deputies came to evict her from her home of 38 years.
Yeah, I’ve heard of lot of things said over the past week, but nothing in the way of solutions, hope or even a modicum of compassion from the McCain-Palin ticket. Just a lot of nasty lies, smears, character assassinations and hate-mongering, that can only serve to tear this country apart even further, at a time when we so desperately need capable leaders with the wisdom, intelligence and temperament to lead us in a direction of hope and healing.
This is a human face for a great national tragedy. — Dennis Kucinich, speaking on behalf of Addie Polk, whose foreclosure has been dismissed, thanks to the efforts of Congressman Kucinich, October 3, 2008
Neighbor Robert Dillon, 62, used a ladder to enter a second-story bathroom window of Polk’s home (left) after he and the deputies heard loud noises inside. He hurried downstairs and let the deputies in. He said they told him they found Polk’s car keys, pocketbook and life insurance policy laid out neatly where they could be found, suggesting she intended to kill herself. — CNN News report, October 3, 2008
Our opponent … is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect, imperfect enough, that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country. — Sarah Palin, speaking on Barack Obama, October 4, 2008
Two things are important now. No. 1, that the administration uses the authority that it’s been given wisely. So we have to make sure that Secretary Paulson and others are structuring the purchase of these…troubled assets in a way that protects taxpayers. That’s very important. The second thing we have to do is we’ve gotta make sure that homeowners are benefiting. Now the Treasurer has authority to work with the modification of mortgages to prevent foreclosure. He’s supposed to come up with plans to do that. I want those plans on tap quick so that we start getting some relief to homeowners out in neighborhoods. The final thing is understanding that even if this rescue package works exactly as it should it’s only the beginning. It’s not the end because we still have 150,000 [sic; it was 159,000] new people who’ve lost their jobs this month, 750,000 people since the beginning of this year. — Barack Obama, October 4, 2008
** And Speaking of Terrorists….
From the standpoint of a presidential campaign, slinging crap willy-nilly all over your opponent carries both benefits and risks. It draws crowds, for sure. But there’s always the risk of some kid wandering up and saying something wise, like, “What’s that brown stuff all over the emperor’s face?” In this spirit, I offer the following links, from which you can draw your own conclusions.
Huffington Post: McCain linked to private group in Iran-Contra case – GOP presidential nominee John McCain has past connections to a private group that supplied aid to guerrillas seeking to overthrow the leftist government of Nicaragua in the Iran-Contra affair. McCain’s ties are facing renewed scrutiny after his campaign criticized Barack Obama for his link to a former radical who engaged in violent acts 40 years ago. The U.S. Council for World Freedom was part of an international organization linked to former Nazi collaborators and ultra-right-wing death squads in Central America. The group was dedicated to stamping out communism around the globe.
Huffington Post: Why McCain’s time with the U.S. Council for World Freedom matters – The USCWF was founded in Phoenix, Arizona in November 1981 as an offshoot of the World Anti-Communist League. The group was, from the onset, saddled with the disreputable reputation of its parent group. The WACL had ties to ultra-right figures and Latin American death squads. Roger Pearson, the chairman of the WACL, was expelled from the group in 1980 under allegations that he was a member of a neo-Nazi organization.
Think Progress: McCain voted to protect domestic terrorists who carry out violence at abortion clinics – McCain has repeatedly voted against protecting Americans from domestic terrorists in the anti-choice movement. On multiple occasions throughout his career, McCain sought to limit the government’s ability to punish violent anti-choice fanatics.
ABOVE: Sarah addresses the Alaska Independence Party (AIP or AKIP) Convention in this video. Sarah and Todd Palin formerly “palled around” with the Alaska Independence Party (AIP), a militia party that seeks to have Alaska secede from the union, as either an independent country or a commonwealth. The McCain campaign denies Sarah’s involvement with this radical political party, citing as evidence the (true) fact that Sarah has been a registered Republican since 1982. This does not explain or negate the fact that she and Todd nonetheless have a history of “palling around” with this group. Todd was a member of this party from 1995 to 2002, until Sarah assumed the duties as Mayor of Wasilla.
ABOVE: The McCain party’s denial of Sarah Palin’s involvement with this group conradicts statements made by its leader, Dexter Clark, in the October 2007 video, above, starting at 1:01. (For a longer version of this video, see here, with the Palin quote starting at 6:00.) Dexter Clarks’s speech was delivered at the 2nd Secessionist Convention, in Tennessee, in October 2007. Below is a quote from this speech.
Our current governor, who I mentioned in our last conference — the one we were hoping would get elected, Sarah Palin, did get elected. There’s a joke, she’s a pretty good looking gal. The joke goes around that we were the coldest state with the hottest governor. And there’s a lot of talk about her moving up. She was an AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town, that was a non-partisan job, but you get along as you go along. She eventually jointed the Rebublican Party where she had all kinds of problems with their ethics, and, uh, I won’t go into that. She also has an 80% aproval rating, and is pretty well sympathetic to her former membership.
More links on Sarah:
The Consortium Report: Sarah Palin’s Party Loyalty – You may have heard that she once belonged to a political party, the Alaska Independence Party, which sports the occasional mission of establishing Alaska as its own country…. Leaders of the G.O.P. and the religious right have vowed to stick with her. But what if she supported a third party that’s bent on smashing up the Republican Party? Or one with links to militia groups? Would she still look like your garden-variety church lady to the Republican Party pooh-bahs?
Talk to Action: The Council for National Policy Meets in Minn, Vets Palin –Last week, while the media focused almost obsessively on the DNC’s spectacle in Denver, the country’s most influential conservatives met quietly at a hotel in downtown Minneapolis to get to know Sarah Palin. The assembled were members of the Council for National Policy, an ultra-secretive cabal that networks wealthy right-wing donors together with top conservative operatives to plan long-term movement strategy.